Itioso UniversitParis DescartesAbstractThe present study examines how target group’s stereotype
Itioso UniversitParis DescartesAbstractThe present study examines how target group’s stereotype content (on warmth and competence dimensions) influences subsequent target evaluation following selfthreat associated with one’s competence. Participants initial received threatening or nonthreatening feedback on their competence. They evaluated then a job candidate who was stereotyped either as competent and cold (Asian) or as warm and incompetent (working mother). As predicted, threatened participants derogated only the Asian target on her perceived warmth and her suitability for any job, but didn’t derogate the operating mother. In addition, perceived warmth mediated the observed variations within the evaluation with the targets’ job suitability. These outcomes extend investigation on selfthreat and prejudice by including Stereotype Content Model in this link.Keywords Selfthreat; Motivation; Stereotyping; Stereotypecontent People’s motivation to sustain a good selfimage has been shown to cause unfavorable evaluations of stereotyped targets. Despite the fact that men and women differ in their chronic motivation to keep a constructive selfimage, particular events that threaten one’s good selfimage can activate this motivation. Selfthreat decreases selfesteem (FGFR4-IN-1 supplier Baumeister Tice, 985) and consequently, persons engage in approaches to restore their selfesteem and constructive selfimage. Fein and Spencer (997) showed that 1 of those techniques incorporates derogating members of stereotyped group. Which is, selfthreat increases damaging evaluation of stereotyped targets. These authors initially gave participants false negative (i.e. selfthreatening) or constructive feedback on an alleged I.Q. test. Participants then evaluated a job candidate who was either Jewish (i.e JAP: “Jewish American Princess”) or Italian. Final results showed that following selfthreat, participants evaluated the Jewish candidate a lot more negatively than the Italian candidate. This effect was not discovered following optimistic feedback. Though both of these targets are members of stereotyped outgroups, only the Jewish target was derogated. We recommend that not all (stereotyped) targets are suitable to satisfy one’s motivation to restore a positive selfimage following a threat. Based on Fein and Spencer, only negatively stereotyped targets (e.g JAP, homosexuals) are most likely to be derogated following selfthreat. As these authors argued, the JAP stereotype is globally speaking a lot more adverse than the Italian stereotype. Therefore, adverse stereotypes may possibly justify the damaging evaluation of targets (Kunda Spencer, 2003). Nonetheless, as proposed by the Stereotype Content material Model (SCM, Fiske, Cuddy, Glick Xu, 2002; Fiske, Xu, Cuddy Glick, 999), a lot of outgroups would be the objects of damaging stereotyping, but not for the exact same cause. The present function aims to refine the selfthreat stereotype link by which includes the target stereotype content material. This PubMed ID:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25361489 research will also refine the SCM by showing that distinct types of selfthreat motivate differential usage from the stereotype content dimensions.NIHPA Author Manuscript NIHPA Author Manuscript NIHPA Author ManuscriptStereotype Content material ModelFiske et al.’s (2002) perform revealed that stereotype content varies along two principal dimensions: Competence and warmth. Perceived levels of competence and warmth indicate to what extent a group is respected and liked, respectively. Two key types of mixed stereotypes can thus be derived: Paternalistic stereotypes incorporate groups perceived as warm but not competent (e.g housewiv.